For a full checklist of everything to review in any contract, start with this guide: What to Review Before Signing a Service Contract. Here we focus on the 7 most dangerous clauses, with real-world examples and how to negotiate them.

If you work as a freelancer, chances are you have signed a contract without reading it carefully. It is a common mistake — and it can be a costly one.

In this guide I walk through the 7 most dangerous clauses that appear in freelance service contracts, with real examples of contract language and the alternatives you can negotiate before signing.

Contents

  1. Full assignment of copyright
  2. Concealed exclusivity clause
  3. Abusive or open-ended payment terms
  4. Ownership of your pre-existing work
  5. Non-compete without time limit or compensation
  6. Unlimited liability for damages
  7. Unilateral contract modifications
  8. Summary: quick warning signs

1. Full and irrevocable assignment of copyright

This is the most common trap. The client wants all rights, forever, in every format and territory, including future derivative works.

Example of a dangerous clause: "The freelancer irrevocably and exclusively assigns all intellectual property rights in the delivered works, without temporal or geographical limitation, including moral rights to the maximum extent permitted by law."

How to negotiate it: Agree to assign the exploitation rights needed for the specific agreed use, but retain authorship. Add a clause preventing the client from sub-licensing without your consent. Include a portfolio clause: the right to show the work on your website and professional profiles.

2. Concealed exclusivity clause

This sometimes appears as "full dedication" or "preferential availability." In practice it prevents you from working for other clients without saying so explicitly.

Real example of a dangerous clause: "The service provider agrees to prioritise the client's assignments above any other project for the duration of the contract."

How to negotiate it: If you accept exclusivity, make it explicit — with additional financial compensation and a clear time limit. Without compensation, there is no exclusivity. Never sign vague clauses about "availability" or "priority."

3. Abusive or open-ended payment terms

The Late Payments Directive sets a maximum legal term of 60 days. Many companies include clauses that exceed this limit or tie payment to internal approval processes with no deadline.

Real example of a dangerous clause: "Payment will be made within 90 days of the invoice being approved internally by the finance department, with no deadline set for that approval."

How to negotiate it: Insist on a maximum of 30 days from delivery or invoicing. Include automatic late-payment interest (you can reference the applicable legal rate). Never leave payment conditional on the client's internal processes without a hard deadline.

4. The client takes ownership of your pre-existing work

Some clauses apply retroactively to tools, code, templates, or methodologies you already had before you started working with that client.

Real example of a dangerous clause: "Any material, code, or asset used in the provision of services shall become the exclusive property of the client."

How to negotiate it: Add an appendix to the contract explicitly listing your pre-existing assets (frameworks, libraries, templates). Make it clear the client receives a licence to use them, not ownership. This is especially critical for developers and designers.

5. Non-compete without limits or compensation

A reasonable non-compete clause has a maximum duration, a defined geographical scope, and financial compensation. When any of these elements is missing, the clause may be unenforceable — or simply unfair.

Real example of a dangerous clause: "The freelancer agrees not to provide services to companies in the same sector as the client for the 5 years following the end of the contract, in any country in the world."

How to negotiate it: Accept a maximum of 6–12 months, a reasonable geographical scope, and a closed list of direct competitors. If there is a restriction, there must be compensation. More than 2 years without compensation is abusive and probably unenforceable in court.

6. Unlimited liability for any damage

If something goes wrong, how much could you lose? Without a liability cap, you could be held personally liable for a mistake in a project that paid you €800.

Real example of a dangerous clause: "The freelancer shall be liable for all direct, indirect, incidental, consequential damages, and lost profits arising from any error or omission in the services provided."

How to negotiate it: Cap your liability at the total value of the project or at fees earned over the last 12 months. Exclude indirect damages and lost profits. Consider taking out professional indemnity insurance if you work in high-risk sectors.

7. Unilateral contract modifications

Some companies reserve the right to change the scope, timelines, or financial terms without needing your express agreement.

Real example of a dangerous clause: "The client may modify the project scope by giving the freelancer 48 hours' written notice, without this entitling the freelancer to additional compensation."

How to negotiate it: Any change to the scope must be agreed in writing and accompanied by an adjustment to price and timeline. Include a change-order clause establishing the process for requesting and approving modifications, with an hourly rate for additional work.

Summary: quick warning signs

Before signing any contract, look out for these key phrases:

  • "irrevocable," "perpetual," or "without time limit"
  • "priority," "preferential dedication," or "exclusive availability"
  • "any damage," "indirect damages," or "lost profits"
  • "exclusive property" applied to all material used
  • "the client may modify" with no mention of compensation
  • "non-compete" with no defined duration, scope, or compensation
  • Payment terms exceeding 60 days or tied to internal approval processes

Frequently asked questions about abusive clauses in freelance contracts

Can I refuse to sign a full rights-assignment clause?

Yes. You can propose assigning only the exploitation rights needed for the agreed use, while retaining authorship and the right to display the work in your portfolio.

Is a 90-day payment term legal in Spain?

No. For most commercial transactions, the Late Payments Act sets a maximum of 60 days. Any longer term — or one tied to internal approval with no deadline — is a clear warning sign.

Is a non-compete clause without compensation enforceable?

It is highly questionable and, in many cases, unenforceable in court — especially if it has no time limit, no defined geographical scope, and no financial compensation.

Have a contract you would like reviewed? At Legal Stones we analyse your freelance contract and tell you which clauses are negotiable, which may be void, and how to draft alternatives that protect you. Request your contract review.